Re:A Formal Analysis of Apple's iMessage PQ3 Protocol [pdf]
by mmooss on Saturday May 10, 2025 @02:32PM
(#43947808)
You can disable stories in the settings. But what's BS to you is a big deal in the Indonesian and other markets. Your UX is not everyone's.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:A Formal Analysis of Apple's iMessage PQ3 Protocol [pdf]
by tgma on Saturday May 10, 2025 @03:47PM
(#43948344)
You can disable stories. The UX still is shit. Again, death by a thousand cuts. As for Indonesia or whatever, I am sure people Stories increases engagement that boosts Signal executives morale thinking they are more relevant and can stick it to Zuck. I just don’t want it in a serious messaging app that hopes to be used in place of iMessage or Google Messages and since we are debating opinions, I take Apple’s judgement on design over aggregate clicks from Indonesians.
Re:A Formal Analysis of Apple's iMessage PQ3 Protocol [pdf]
by mmooss on Saturday May 10, 2025 @04:58PM
(#43948949)
Do you have some basis for what you say? It's just a rant at this point; it hardly has a specific criticism and fabricates things about people you probably don't know. Whatever you think, that doesn't make it so.
Re:A Formal Analysis of Apple's iMessage PQ3 Protocol [pdf]
by tgma on Saturday May 10, 2025 @05:31PM
(#43949174)
Stories was a specific criticism; was it not?
I understand that our opinions don't agree, so I cite Apple's market research and design decision to bolster my case.
But I will stop there. Maybe just peddle your BS to ask folks to shut up elsewhere. Who are you even to know whom I know or not?