Samsung is paying $350M for audio brands B&W, Denon, Marantz and Polk

Re:Samsung is paying $350M for audio brands B&W, Denon, Mara... by TiredOfLife on Wednesday May 07, 2025 @05:18PM (#43920658)

> There is no more "Nirvana"

That cacophony was considered quality music?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Samsung is paying $350M for audio brands B&W, Denon, Mara... by lupusreal on Thursday May 08, 2025 @06:24AM (#43924821)

Subjectivity aside, I'm pretty sure Nirvana's target audience was teenagers using cheap headphones or their car stereos, not boomers with expensive HiFi setups, so that really is a funny remark.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Samsung is paying $350M for audio brands B&W, Denon, Mara... by neuroelectron on Friday May 09, 2025 @03:51PM (#43940353)

https://archive.org/details/nirvana-mtv-unplugged-in-new-yor...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Samsung is paying $350M for audio brands B&W, Denon, Mara... by vile_wretch on Thursday May 08, 2025 @10:54AM (#43926646)

Are you 100 years old?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Samsung is paying $350M for audio brands B&W, Denon, Mara... by neuroelectron on Thursday May 08, 2025 @11:42AM (#43927255)

Name one good movie since Titanic

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Samsung is paying $350M for audio brands B&W, Denon, Mara... by vile_wretch on Thursday May 08, 2025 @02:08PM (#43929314)

Titanic 2

(I was replying to the person who called Nirvana cacophony/not music)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Samsung is paying $350M for audio brands B&W, Denon, Mara... by TiredOfLife on Thursday May 08, 2025 @03:55PM (#43930632)

No. But I have ears

[ Parent | on HN ]