Re:Matt Godbolt sold me on Rust by showing me C++
by const_cast on Wednesday May 07, 2025 @12:10AM
(#43912194)
This only really applies to languages that don't check this at compile-time. I don't consider compile-time errors a foot gun. I mean, it should be impossible for that kind of bad code to ever get merged in most reasonable CI/CD processes.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Matt Godbolt sold me on Rust by showing me C++
by Ygg2 on Wednesday May 07, 2025 @03:47AM
(#43913166)
No? This happens in any language that has keyword args.
If I delete/rename a field of a class in any statically checked language, it's going to report a compile error, and it's still a breaking change.
Re:Matt Godbolt sold me on Rust by showing me C++
by const_cast on Wednesday May 07, 2025 @05:31PM
(#43920766)
Sure, but it doesn't actually matter because this can't ever manifest as a bug. Your PR will just be rejected, which to me, is correct behavior.
Typically when you're changing a name you're changing behavior, too. This isn't just something we should let slip under the radar, otherwise bugs can actually manifest.