Re:UK threaten to enter Ecuadorian embassy and arrest Julian...
by droithomme on Thursday August 16, 2012 @02:59AM
(#4390227)
Here are some facts:
1. Neither woman has stated Assange raped her.
2. Assange has not been charged with rape.
Here are some lies:
1. The women state that Assange raped them.
2. Assange has been charged with rape.
Here is the transcript of the interview referenced in the Naomi Wolf attack article that you have cited.
http://www.democracynow.org/seo/2010/12/20/naomi_wolf_vs_jac...
Re:UK threaten to enter Ecuadorian embassy and arrest Julian...
by philwelch on Thursday August 16, 2012 @05:16AM
(#4390546)
Fine. The truth is, it doesn't really matter. I would be ecstatic for the Swedish criminal justice system to carefully consider all the evidence and come to a fair outcome for everyone involved. My concern is that Julian Assange is obstructing this process out of either paranoid delusion or regular evasiveness, and his political supporters are all too eager to support his actions.
Emphasis added. Source: http://www.slate.com/articles/double_x/doublex/2010/12/the_p...
Please note that "having sex with [someone] without [their] consent" is the definition of rape.