It "works for me".

It's not like there's much reason to care about comforts on short flights. Anyone can tolerate economy for an hour and you'd probably not get out your VR headset for a short hop either.

Regardless, you don't throw away your headset after a flight, obviously, so even if the ticket were half the price you'd still come out ahead after two or three trips.

This said, headsets like AVP improve the flying experience but don't magically solve it: they are still too heavy and uncomfortable to wear for more than 1-2 hours. That's why I'm betting on the more lightweight (and cheaper) sunglass-like products to actually win that market.

The headset is heavy, but I find that's much ameliorated by lying backwards a bit (which is easy to do in a business-class lie-flat seat).

VRChat, I agree, should absolutely be there and unrestricted. It wont be though. It isn't uncensored on Oculus either.

VR pornography is quite massive in Japan for instance. Huge in fact. The Vision Pro doesn't even have a DMM.com/Fanza app for that.

I don't think most users would even consider getting a device that doesn't allow them to view their existing catalog of purchases, pornography and not.

Again, this could've been solved by simply supporting PCVR.

> VRChat, I agree, should absolutely be there and unrestricted. It wont be though. It isn't uncensored on Oculus either.

I don't think the VR Chat app on Oculus is very popular. Most users are just going to run it via PCVR for better performance, feature support, etc.

Can you elaborate?

It just so happens that most of the more racy avatars also are more detailed/power hungry and run afoul of those limits.