Re:US defense secretary circumvents the official communicati...
by femto on Thursday May 01, 2025 @02:44AM
(#43854404)
Even if Signal's encryption implementation is secure, the device on which it is running probably doesn't satisfy TEMPEST requirements. Most consumer crypto is vulnerable in some way to a side-channel attack.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:US defense secretary circumvents the official communicati...
by wickedsight on Thursday May 01, 2025 @05:36AM
(#43855461)
None of that matters if Signal is running on what is effectively a personal device connected to the internet. That device is now the weak link and is what intelligence agencies in many countries are now probably trying to get into.
Re:US defense secretary circumvents the official communicati...
by nicce on Thursday May 01, 2025 @07:50AM
(#43856458)
Pegasus all the way down as an example.
Re:US defense secretary circumvents the official communicati...
by wickedsight on Thursday May 01, 2025 @08:10AM
(#43856619)
Exactly. And Pegasus is what we know about. I'm sure there's plenty we don't know about that's used for more high profile targets, like former Fox News hosts.