News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why can't stinking rich Ivies cope with losing a few hund... by SpicyLemonZest on Wednesday April 30, 2025 @01:51PM (#43848609)
What's the point of such an abstract question? The university's goals and expected resolution for the problem would always depend critically on why the stream of grants stopped.
Re:Why can't stinking rich Ivies cope with losing a few hund... by aoanevdus on Wednesday April 30, 2025 @02:38PM (#43849150)
When a large institution is faced with uncertainty about the future, it’s both feasible and prudent to make plans that account for multiple future outcomes. In this case, it makes sense to do both of the following:

1) Fight the administration in the legal system.

2) Plan for the case where some of those legal fights are lost.

Re:Why can't stinking rich Ivies cope with losing a few hund... by SpicyLemonZest on Wednesday April 30, 2025 @03:56PM (#43849949)
What does it mean, concretely, to plan for that case? It doesn't sound like there's any risk of a scenario where, like, Columbia can't pay maintenance staff and all the buildings flood. If the US government freezes them out of grant funding, then the research funded by those grants won't be funded any longer - there's no careful planning you can do to make that less true.
Re:Why can't stinking rich Ivies cope with losing a few hund... by nine_k on Wednesday April 30, 2025 @07:05PM (#43851687)
A practical turn: can, say, Harvard or Yale answer: "Screw you, government, I don't need your money, go away!"?