O3 beats a master-level GeoGuessr player, even with fake EXIF data

Re:O3 beats a master-level GeoGuessr player, even with fake ... by godelski on Tuesday April 29, 2025 @09:54PM (#43840380)

IDK what SEO mills and all that have to do with any of this. What other people do doesn't matter. It's something is bad then it doesn't make it not bad because other people do it and do it worse. There's no logic in that framing.

I'm not sure who you think is a fool, me or you. But either way, I don't find your rhetoric acceptable. I explained why I think the title significantly diverges from the content of the article. You're welcome to disagree but that argument will have nothing to do with SEO mills. It's insulting you'd think I'd accept such a silly retort. We're not comparing here, we're categorizing.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:O3 beats a master-level GeoGuessr player, even with fake ... by sdenton4 on Wednesday April 30, 2025 @09:55AM (#43845310)

In short, the title of the piece is in no way fraudulent: No one is being defrauded here, and I don't believe there was any intent to defraud anyone.

The title is not click bait. Titles might be better or worse for their content, but imperfection is not fraud.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:O3 beats a master-level GeoGuessr player, even with fake ... by godelski on Wednesday April 30, 2025 @12:52PM (#43847892)

I'm sorry. You have failed the assignment. You have written an assertion, not an argument. I'm not willing to just take your word on it.

But thank you for clarifying the implicit question in my earlier comment.

[ Parent | on HN ]