News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on O3 beats a master-level GeoGuessr player, even with fake EXIF data. Parent comment

Re:O3 beats a master-level GeoGuessr player, even with fake ... by Filligree on Tuesday April 29, 2025 @07:40PM (#43839388)
o3 was the thing beating GeoGuessr. It isn't external to itself.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:O3 beats a master-level GeoGuessr player, even with fake ... by tshaddox on Wednesday April 30, 2025 @02:01AM (#43841717)
Sure, then o3 plus the World Wide Web was the thing playing the game, and also isn’t external to itself.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:O3 beats a master-level GeoGuessr player, even with fake ... by umanwizard on Wednesday April 30, 2025 @03:52AM (#43842349)
Right, and that’s indeed impressive! But still not what’s claimed in the headline.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:O3 beats a master-level GeoGuessr player, even with fake ... by tshaddox on Wednesday April 30, 2025 @01:44PM (#43848515)
That's debatable, given that searching the web is a standard feature of o3.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:O3 beats a master-level GeoGuessr player, even with fake ... by umanwizard on Wednesday April 30, 2025 @07:16PM (#43851781)
Fair enough, but searching the web is also a standard feature of humans, but explicitly prohibited when playing GG.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:O3 beats a master-level GeoGuessr player, even with fake ... by tshaddox on Thursday May 01, 2025 @02:10PM (#43861289)
The GeoGuessr Community Rules and Terms and Service strongly imply that users must be people, so we are already conceding that exception to the rules when we want computer systems to compete.
[ Parent | on HN ]