Re:Amazon launches first Kuiper internet satellites in bid t...
by thallium205 on Monday April 28, 2025 @08:31PM
(#43827554)
These services are generally terrible compared to Starlink.
Re:Amazon launches first Kuiper internet satellites in bid t...
by esseph on Monday April 28, 2025 @09:35PM
(#43827919)
Maybe 15 years ago, but not for at least 10 years, and definitely 5 in most markets.
I'd take fiber -> Taara -> Tarana 3.65 CBRS any day of the week over any LEO. Way faster, way lower latency, and way lower total cost to deploy. Also scales massively better.
Re:Amazon launches first Kuiper internet satellites in bid t...
by kortilla on Tuesday April 29, 2025 @01:40AM
(#43829010)
>Tarana 3.65 CBRS any day of the week over any LEO. Way faster, way lower latency
To what? Starlink is getting you to a major exchange in two direct shots. When I was testing it in North Dakota I was getting lower latency to Google and Cloudflare through Starlink than I was through local fiber providers (likely due to their long circuitous route to Minneapolis).
Re:Amazon launches first Kuiper internet satellites in bid t...
by esseph on Tuesday April 29, 2025 @07:31AM
(#43831117)
Satellite can't handle the density required for one, but yes, network path is huge.
Same reason a lot of HFT uses microwave vs fiber paths - fiber paths are following the ROW, the microwave paths are the physically shorter paths.
LEO is a niche technology, but not and shouldn't be the default for tons of reasons.
Re:Amazon launches first Kuiper internet satellites in bid t...
by ty6853 on Monday April 28, 2025 @08:37PM
(#43827584)
No doubt, but given the cost and challenge of launching a satellite, I think your best bet if your rural enclave despises Starlink for whatever reason, right now your best bet is to run fiber to a single house and make a mini wireless ISP.
This doesn't work once you get really remote, nor does fiber.
In any case none of them beat the experience of pulling an antenna out of a box and it pretty much just working.