News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Tablet Problem by sigkill on Tuesday August 14, 2012 @11:17AM (#4381316)
To the browser, unless you have a pre-populated list, the autocomplete URLs are just a list of strings. How should it know if penisland.com is a website that sells pens or otherwise? Also, where do draw the line really? therapistfinder.com? expertsexchange.com?
Re:The Tablet Problem by MartinCron on Tuesday August 14, 2012 @01:38PM (#4382089)
Autocomplete URLS don't have to be just lists of strings. Many sites already send down metadata to indicate that they are serving up adult content.

That "honor system" approach, coupled with a pre-populated list that gets updated with regular browser updates, could catch the vast majority of embarrassing situations, like the time I found "handcuffedlesbians.com" in the URL bar at a client's site.

Re:The Tablet Problem by robfig on Tuesday August 14, 2012 @12:36PM (#4381763)
Google already classifies sites as porn or not-porn. They could make a simple API or data file available and the browsers could use it.
Re:The Tablet Problem by Too on Tuesday August 14, 2012 @12:58PM (#4381882)
You want to tell google each time you visit a porn site?

(not that they don't know already since the site probably uses google analytics)

Re:The Tablet Problem by pronoiac on Tuesday August 14, 2012 @01:09PM (#4381943)
I think Bloom filters would allow offline checking, without pinging Google for each request. They already do this for antimalware notices, iirc.
Re:The Tablet Problem by PaulHoule on Tuesday August 14, 2012 @03:01PM (#4382532)
Google developed porn filters during a crisis in 2001. It's a very valuable technology that they're not going to let just anybody share