News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:California's $20 fast-food minimum wage improves pay at s... by standardUser on Saturday April 26, 2025 @04:22PM (#43806830)
An industry report by a private consulting firm that overwhelmingly supports the position of the industry funding the report is not fascinating to me. It's obligatory propaganda. The absence of it would be fascinating.
Re:California's $20 fast-food minimum wage improves pay at s... by hnburnsy on Saturday April 26, 2025 @06:43PM (#43807891)
Do you think the "Institute for Research on Labor and Employment" at Berkley is without biases? I would argue that the Berkley study showing positive results is flawed on wage evaluation as it uses data from Glassdoor. IMO, Glassdoor is not reliable.
Re:California's $20 fast-food minimum wage improves pay at s... by standardUser on Saturday April 26, 2025 @06:56PM (#43807989)
> Do you think the "Institute for Research on Labor and Employment" at Berkley is without biases?

No, did I state or imply that? A private organization was paid by an industry to produce a report, and that report overwhelming supports the industry that paid for the report. How do weigh such data in your own decision-making? I give data from a public university, produced by individuals we could email right now if we wanted, individuals who presumably have reputations and career trajectories, a pretty hefty weight. Not above suspicion and not devoid of bias, but worth parsing. Is an industry report, by the industry for the industry, really worth parsing to you?