News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Wikipedia’s nonprofit status questioned by D.C. U.S. atto... by extra88 on Saturday April 26, 2025 @12:04AM (#43800845)
You can't bring them up without including that voting is compulsory there.
Re:Wikipedia’s nonprofit status questioned by D.C. U.S. atto... by crabmusket on Saturday April 26, 2025 @12:07AM (#43800861)
See my sibling comment. Getting your name checked off is compulsory but nothing stops you from handing in a blank ballot.
Re:Wikipedia’s nonprofit status questioned by D.C. U.S. atto... by swat535 on Saturday April 26, 2025 @06:06AM (#43802297)
Why would you hand blank ballot at. That point? You might as well vote.
Re:Wikipedia’s nonprofit status questioned by D.C. U.S. atto... by aloha2436 on Saturday April 26, 2025 @07:00AM (#43802529)
"I don't like any of the rat-bastards." "I don't care." "I think it's funnier to draw a dick. (And I don't care.)" "I trust other people to make the right choice." "I refuse to participate in this bourgeois sham election." ...are all reasons I've heard, even if I don't actually understand any of them.
Re:Wikipedia’s nonprofit status questioned by D.C. U.S. atto... by extra88 on Saturday April 26, 2025 @08:11AM (#43802911)
For the purposes of this comparison, those "informal" votes still count in the typically used participation statistics. Voters intentionally case "wasted" ballots in other countries too.