News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:AI Horseless Carriages by bee_rider on Wednesday April 23, 2025 @02:13PM (#43774992)
I thought the point of having a meeting-notes person was so that at least one person would pay attention to details during the meeting.
Re:AI Horseless Carriages by jethro_tell on Wednesday April 23, 2025 @03:16PM (#43775698)
I thought it was so I could go back 1 year and say, 'I was against this from the beginning and I was quite vocal that if you do this, the result will be the exact mess you're asking me to clean up now.'
Re:AI Horseless Carriages by bee_rider on Wednesday April 23, 2025 @03:48PM (#43775973)
Ah, but a record for CYA and “told you so”, that’s pure cynicism. “At least one person paying attention” at least we can pretend the intent was to pair some potential usefulness with our cynicism.
Re:AI Horseless Carriages by gus_massa on Wednesday April 23, 2025 @03:20PM (#43775724)
Also, ensure that if the final decition was to paint the the bike shed green, everyone agree it was the final decitions. (In long discusions, sometimes people misunderstand which was the final decition.)
Re:AI Horseless Carriages by soco on Wednesday April 23, 2025 @03:50PM (#43775986)
If they misunderstood they will still disagree so the meeting notes will trigger another mail chain and, you guessed right, another meeting.