Re:First baby born in UK to woman with transplanted womb
by crypteur on Saturday April 19, 2025 @02:38PM
(#43738436)
Nothing in nature can ever be described with 100% accuracy by any model. But that doesn't mean models are useless. So imagine why we would use the binary sex model instead of three or a spectrum or what have you.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:First baby born in UK to woman with transplanted womb
by nathan_compton on Saturday April 19, 2025 @03:04PM
(#43738640)
Simple models are useful, but they shouldn't determine who is allowed to live a normal, productive, life without some very compelling justification. Like the "binary sex model" is handy, but nothing about it makes it obvious that we should definitely and always lock gender (another non-binary model often simplified usefully into a binary) directly to biological sex.
Re:First baby born in UK to woman with transplanted womb
by TheCoelacanth on Saturday April 19, 2025 @03:34PM
(#43738846)
There are only two elements in the universe: hydrogen and helium. The binary element model is 98% accurate.
Re:First baby born in UK to woman with transplanted womb
by ck2 on Saturday April 19, 2025 @03:01PM
(#43738619)
Random but nature related: some birds have four sexes
Re:First baby born in UK to woman with transplanted womb
by aaaja on Saturday April 19, 2025 @03:31PM
(#43738817)
You may be thinking of species like the white-throated sparrow. These have two morphs with distinct behaviours which lead to there being four mating combinations. Still two sexes though.
Re:First baby born in UK to woman with transplanted womb
by BriggyDwiggs42 on Saturday April 19, 2025 @06:37PM
(#43740029)
Is a bimodal distribution, or a somewhat reductive “typical male, typical female, intersex” model, so difficult to understand that we can’t use it? I don’t think people are stupid.