Re:Librarians Are Dangerous
by MattPalmer1086 on Saturday April 19, 2025 @01:43PM
(#43738011)
I also studied independently at a more advanced level than I was supposed to be at. Not sure I follow why this seems quaint or silly to you.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Half of all people are above average.
(Or maybe a third of all people if you count it as a range rather than a point.)
Only if you assume normal distrubition or similar where median and average are the same.
Re:Librarians Are Dangerous
by grandempire on Saturday April 19, 2025 @02:16PM
(#43738263)
What did it do for you?
Re:Librarians Are Dangerous
by MattPalmer1086 on Saturday April 19, 2025 @02:52PM
(#43738555)
I enjoyed it, and it gave me confidence that I was capable of doing some interesting things. My schooling wasn't very inspirational.
Still not sure why it seems silly to you.
Re:Librarians Are Dangerous
by grandempire on Saturday April 19, 2025 @06:15PM
(#43739917)
What seems silly to me is the particular cultural excitement and optimism around education and liberalism, and the way it was manifest in school, that I lived through as a kid and is now dead.
Re:Librarians Are Dangerous
by MattPalmer1086 on Sunday April 20, 2025 @06:45AM
(#43742940)
We may be talking about different eras. I'm Gen X, I don't remember any great excitement or optimism manifested in schools of my time.
Quite the contrary; I think I was one of only two or three people in my year to go on to university. But then I was a huge nerd who was really interested in ideas.
Re:Librarians Are Dangerous
by grandempire on Sunday April 20, 2025 @07:47AM
(#43743193)
Yes I think that’s right. Thanks for sharing. Kids of the 60s-70s who were outsiders because of their academic/nerdy interest became teachers and created a culture with the ideals they thought were missing. And that’s what I experienced.