Re:15,000 lines of verified cryptography now in Python
by matheusmoreira on Saturday April 19, 2025 @01:05PM
(#43737699)
> Those are great guidelines for never achieving anything relevant.
Relevant to whom? Everything I've done is extremely relevant to me. I wouldn't have done those things if I didn't care about them.
> Also, the same ideas applied to dating rather than to code are what we call "incels/redpillers" and so on
I'd say it's more like MGTOW.
Re:15,000 lines of verified cryptography now in Python
by AlexeyBelov on Sunday April 20, 2025 @03:00AM
(#43742045)
MGTOW are incels/redpillers though.
Re:15,000 lines of verified cryptography now in Python
by matheusmoreira on Sunday April 20, 2025 @02:12PM
(#43745415)
They're related but not the same. In this context, an "incel" would be someone who's incapable of contributing to projects despite wanting to. That's not my case.
Re:15,000 lines of verified cryptography now in Python
by LtWorf on Sunday April 20, 2025 @06:35PM
(#43747016)
If your contributions have all been rejected, it could be that they weren't as good as you think they were?
I've certainly made people angry when I rejected their buggy "improvements".
Re:15,000 lines of verified cryptography now in Python
by matheusmoreira on Sunday April 20, 2025 @06:58PM
(#43747155)
> If your contributions have all been rejected
They haven't.
I see your point though:
> it could be that they weren't as good as you think they were
Who knows. Maybe. Asked myself that question many times. Asked others.
It doesn't matter anymore. Now I only wonder if they are good enough for me.
Also, the same ideas applied to dating rather than to code are what we call "incels/redpillers" and so on, so you might want to calm down a bit I think.