News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Discord's face scanning age checks 'start of a bigger shift' by michaelt on Thursday April 17, 2025 @08:09PM (#43723606)
Unfortunately, no amount of blockchains and zero-knowledge proofs can compensate for the fact that 15 year old has a 18 year old friend. Or the fact that other 15 year old looks older than some 20 year olds. Or the fact that other 15 year old's dad often leaves his wallet, with his driving license, unattended.

Over the next five years, you can look forward to a steady trickle of stories in the press about shocked parents finding that somehow their 15 year old passed a one-time over-18 age verification check.

The fact compliance is nigh-impossible to comply with is intentional - the law is designed that way, because the intent is to deliver a porn ban while sidestepping free speech objections.

Re:Discord's face scanning age checks 'start of a bigger shift' by Hyperboreanal on Friday April 18, 2025 @02:48AM (#43725641)
Reducing the amount of children getting addicted to porn by any amount is better than not reducing it at all.
Re:Discord's face scanning age checks 'start of a bigger shift' by padjo on Friday April 18, 2025 @03:30AM (#43725864)
By any means?
Re:Discord's face scanning age checks 'start of a bigger shift' by Hyperboreanal on Friday April 18, 2025 @04:29PM (#43731607)
Yes.
Re:Discord's face scanning age checks 'start of a bigger shift' by throwaway290 on Friday April 18, 2025 @02:56PM (#43730907)
None of these things are a problem.

> 15 year old has a 18 year old friend

Adults can be prosecuted for helping minors circumvent the checks.

> Or the fact that other 15 year old looks older than some 20 year olds

See Australian approach. Site can verify you and both government and site don't know who you are. No need for photo.

> shocked parents finding

No law is a replacement for bad parenting. But good parenting is easier with the right laws.

> a one-time over-18 age verification check

it can happen more than once non intrusively.

Re:Discord's face scanning age checks 'start of a bigger shift' by michaelt on Saturday April 19, 2025 @03:55PM (#43739004)
> Adults can be prosecuted for helping minors circumvent the checks.

If you skip the need for privacy protection and just retain a copy of the photo ID used to verify the account? Then sure.

But if age is validated in a way that preserves privacy? Then there's no evidence linking the adult to the crime.

Re:Discord's face scanning age checks 'start of a bigger shift' by throwaway290 on Sunday April 20, 2025 @05:02AM (#43742564)
"No evidence" doesn't make it not a crime. Most people wouldn't do crime even if no one found out.

And once that adult committed a crime anyone involved can report it, including that minor friend. It's blackmail material. Better not fall out!