News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Harvard's response to federal government letter demanding changes. Parent comment

Re:Harvard's response to federal government letter demanding... by acdha on Wednesday April 16, 2025 @08:41AM (#43704698)
> Even then, we want the subset of bans that were for political reasons (i.e., supporting Labour is fine, supporting Reform is hate speech).

Do you have any examples was banned for supporting Reform? I ask because I’ve lost track of how many times I’ve heard someone say they were banned for their political views and then checked to see that what actually got them banned was something like targeted harassment of a political opponent.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Harvard's response to federal government letter demanding... by NoImmatureAdHom on Wednesday April 16, 2025 @09:19AM (#43705146)
I didn't mean this as a real example, I meant it as illustrative. I've never seen anyone banned for supporting Reform (I've never seen anyone banned at all! I try to limit my internets).
[ Parent | on HN ]