News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Harvard's response to federal government letter demanding changes. Parent comment

Re:Harvard's response to federal government letter demanding... by johnnyanmac on Wednesday April 16, 2025 @02:08AM (#43702014)
If you're a free speech absolutionist (your argument was simply "kicking off got more intense"), it shouldn't matter what speech was said to get kicked. Politcal or not, it's all speech.

So the only way to retort the bans tripling is if you think Most people banned are not humans. Which is possible, but unlikely given current speculations that Twitter is 80% bots.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Harvard's response to federal government letter demanding... by NoImmatureAdHom on Wednesday April 16, 2025 @09:21AM (#43705183)
> Politcal or not, it's all speech.

This is a fair point. If I concede it, we still need some denominators.

> So the only way to retort the bans tripling is if you think Most people banned are not humans.

Denominators.

[ Parent | on HN ]