News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Whistleblower details how DOGE may have taken sensitive N... by billy99k on Tuesday April 15, 2025 @10:49PM (#43700913)
I will need to see the logs and all of the data to believe this. This was the standard when there were claims of election fraud during the 2020 election.

The difference is that the security community then wouldn't even listen to actual hard-evidence, and this is seemingly believed with nothing more than a whistleblower stating it as fact.

Re:Whistleblower details how DOGE may have taken sensitive N... by crowselect on Tuesday April 15, 2025 @11:18PM (#43701090)
The security community didn’t ignore hard evidence - the “hard evidence” didn’t stand up to basic scrutiny.

These claims may well be false, but they deserve scrutiny, and waving them away while perpetuating a much repeated lie isn’t helping anyone except criminals and corruption.

Bottom line: this deserves investigation.