Re:Whistleblower details how DOGE may have taken sensitive N...
by crowselect on Tuesday April 15, 2025 @11:18PM
(#43701090)
The security community didn’t ignore hard evidence - the “hard evidence” didn’t stand up to basic scrutiny.
These claims may well be false, but they deserve scrutiny, and waving them away while perpetuating a much repeated lie isn’t helping anyone except criminals and corruption.
Bottom line: this deserves investigation.
The difference is that the security community then wouldn't even listen to actual hard-evidence, and this is seemingly believed with nothing more than a whistleblower stating it as fact.