News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Harvard's response to federal government letter demanding... by insane_dreamer on Tuesday April 15, 2025 @12:04PM (#43694808)
Pretty bad false equivalency. Barry was barred from running and went to federal prison. Yes, he was eligible to run (and was re-elected) but only _after_ he served his sentence. Did I miss the part where Trump went to jail?

You also can't compare a mayoral election with a presidential one.

Re:Harvard's response to federal government letter demanding... by koolba on Tuesday April 15, 2025 @01:32PM (#43695978)
> Pretty bad false equivalency. Barry was barred from running and went to federal prison. Yes, he was eligible to run (and was re-elected) but only _after_ he served his sentence. Did I miss the part where Trump went to jail?

Nope. Though you also missed the part where the manufacturing of "felony" charges was so novel they had never been attempted before. The closest parallel is probably the case of John Edwards who was acquitted: https://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/01/us/edwards-jury-returns-n... But you probably think it's because he was also a white man and not because there was no criminal act.

I'm curious if you can even sum up what exactly was the felony that Trump was convicted, or even better, who's the victim? Because all I saw was an overzealous DA in NY with utter disregard for the actual law.

> You also can't compare a mayoral election with a presidential one.

Yes. And clearly people of DC would rather elect a Democrat crackhead over any Republican.

Re:Harvard's response to federal government letter demanding... by insane_dreamer on Tuesday April 15, 2025 @02:14PM (#43696504)
You're on to a different argument now.

My point was about surviving scandals as a candidate. Trump survived the Hollywood Access tape, where it would have buried most candidates. Your example was "whatabout Barry" -- but they're not comparable (and Barry did not survive his scandal, but went to jail).

Re:Harvard's response to federal government letter demanding... by koolba on Tuesday April 15, 2025 @02:31PM (#43696709)
Why would you expect Trump to go to jail for a manufactured felony charge? Even if it was a legitimate case, the sentencing guidelines would not have recommended jail time.
Re:Harvard's response to federal government letter demanding... by johnnyanmac on Wednesday April 16, 2025 @03:19AM (#43702451)
>manufactured felony charge?

Pretty sure sedition was around since Shay's rebellion.

And yes, welcome to privileged. They made up new laws to arrest black men without saying it's targeting black men. Hence the metaphor in this chain.