Re:Harvard's response to federal government letter demanding...
by actionfromafar on Tuesday April 15, 2025 @04:10AM
(#43690210)
First of all, prime can be pretty good vs being taxed. Secondly, who knows what kind of sweetheart deal can be pulled for a small (in the big scheme of things) "loan" when banking of billions is at stake.
Re:Harvard's response to federal government letter demanding...
by pclmulqdq on Tuesday April 15, 2025 @06:09AM
(#43690908)
An ELOC for a HNWI can be significantly lower interest than a mortgage. They can often get "fed funds rate/LIBOR + 0.5%" or so. This is because they can accept a floating rate, while mortgage rates get locked in for 10-30 years.
Re:Harvard's response to federal government letter demanding...
by triceratops on Tuesday April 15, 2025 @09:08AM
(#43692143)
> Nobody loans out money with a guaranteed prospect of below market returns
Not to you or me. Giving powerful people who can send more business the bank's way a freebie on their personal accounts might make sense as a loss leader.
Re:Harvard's response to federal government letter demanding...
by FireBeyond on Tuesday April 15, 2025 @10:09PM
(#43700684)
Adam Neumann and several others in that era famously got very large zero interest personal loans because the bank wanted their corporate business.
Usually about the lowest rate you can get is a mortgage on your house.
Of course, if your credit is bad, you're not going to get a good rate.