News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Windows 2000 Server named peak Microsoft. Readers say all... by IlikeKitties on Saturday April 12, 2025 @12:54AM (#43661466)
I never understood the issue with the ribbon UI. Epecially for Office it was great, so much easier to find stuff.
Re:Windows 2000 Server named peak Microsoft. Readers say all... by josephg on Saturday April 12, 2025 @03:29AM (#43662188)
My big problem with it is that it’s stateful. A menu or toolbar admits muscle memory - since you get used to where a certain button or option is and you can find it easily. With ribbons you need to know if you’re in the right submenu first.

Though personally, I’m increasingly delighted by the quicksilver - style palette / action tools that vscode and IntelliJ use for infrequently used options. Just hit the hotkey and type, and the option you want appears under the enter key.

Re:Windows 2000 Server named peak Microsoft. Readers say all... by wolpoli on Saturday April 12, 2025 @02:18AM (#43661833)
Those of us working in jobs use the same couple of functions in our office products. We don't really go and find features.
Re:Windows 2000 Server named peak Microsoft. Readers say all... by eviks on Saturday April 12, 2025 @12:59AM (#43661493)
It's not easily customizable and it takes more space, not much to understand
Re:Windows 2000 Server named peak Microsoft. Readers say all... by bruce511 on Saturday April 12, 2025 @01:16AM (#43661562)
I'm not sure it takes more space than a menu and toolbar, but regardless, monitors are a LOT larger now than in 2003 so...

Frankly, I'm motivated sure customizing is a win either. I fo a lot of remote support and it's nice to have a consistent interface.

Personally I find it faster than menus, and easier to find things I seldom use.

But I appreciate it's a personal taste thing, and some older folks prefer older interfaces.

Re:Windows 2000 Server named peak Microsoft. Readers say all... by eviks on Saturday April 12, 2025 @01:27AM (#43661589)
Just compare and become sure! The larger screen isn't a good excuse to waste space either.

And users are way more important than the tiny group of tech support.

Re:Windows 2000 Server named peak Microsoft. Readers say all... by panxyh on Saturday April 12, 2025 @02:10AM (#43661790)
Also those that need tech support will be less likely to customize.
Re:Windows 2000 Server named peak Microsoft. Readers say all... by homebrewer on Saturday April 12, 2025 @07:50AM (#43663602)
Your monitors, those of a well-off power user, may have become larger. Most regular users I've seen are on 15" laptops with screens at 1366×768, or (if they're lucky) 1920×1080 with scaling at 1.25× or so. 17" desktop monitors used to be commonplace about 20 years ago.

The slightly larger screen real estate (if any) is more than wasted by very inefficient "modern UIs" where you won't find paddings smaller than 16px, with three buttons where there used to be enough space for 9.

Re:Windows 2000 Server named peak Microsoft. Readers say all... by lproven on Saturday April 12, 2025 @07:08AM (#43663373)
> I never understood the issue with the ribbon UI. Epecially for Office it was great, so much easier to find stuff.

1. I don't need to find stuff.

I knew where stuff is.

2. I read text. I only need menus. I don't need toolbars etc. and so I turn them all off.

I cannot read icons. I have to guess. It's like searching for 3 things I need in an unfamiliar supermarket.

3. Menus are very space efficient.

Ribbons hog precious vertical space. This is doubly disastrous on widescreens.

4. I am a keyboard user.

I use keys to navigate menus. It's much faster than aiming at targets with the mouse and I don't need to look. The navigation keys don't work any more.

Ribbons help those who don't know what they are doing and do not care about speed and efficiency.

They punish experts who do know, don't search, don't hunt, and customise themselves and their apps for speed and efficient use of time and screen space.

Re:Windows 2000 Server named peak Microsoft. Readers say all... by kenjackson on Saturday April 12, 2025 @09:15AM (#43664098)
Just hide the ribbon.
Re:Windows 2000 Server named peak Microsoft. Readers say all... by shakna on Saturday April 12, 2025 @12:32PM (#43665859)
And it'll be back in the next update.
Re:Windows 2000 Server named peak Microsoft. Readers say all... by lproven on Saturday April 12, 2025 @12:33PM (#43665876)
On a Mac, that's fine. On Windows, it's not, because then I can't control the app any more.

I have been using Word since version 4 on DOS and version 5 on Classic MacOS. On Windows, I used WinWord 1, 2, 6, 95, 97, 2000, XP and 2003... then 4 years later MS ripped out the UI I knew backwards and had known for about 16 years, since 1991, and replaced it with one inferior in every way for me.

I'm not denying it might be better for others but for me it's now a waste of disk space.

The old versions do all I need, so I keep them. For everything except Word, there is LibreOffice.

But LibreOffice Writer has no outline mode, and I am a writer: that is THE killer function of Word for me.

So, Word 97 under WINE on Linux and Word 2003 when I have to use Win10 or -- shudder -- Win11.

Re:Windows 2000 Server named peak Microsoft. Readers say all... by mschuster91 on Saturday April 12, 2025 @12:28PM (#43665824)
> They punish experts who do know, don't search, don't hunt, and customise themselves and their apps for speed and efficient use of time and screen space.

The problem is, most users are utterly braindead, they barely manage to type at speed instead of pecking at single keys. The astonishment I've gotten in some places for literally nothing more than Ctrl+C/Ctrl+V is more than enough proof.

That's also IMHO a large portion of why Linux never really took off on desktop. UX/UI people are rare enough to begin with, most of them don't work on FOSS in their free time, and so development is primarily done by nerds for nerds. That's great if you already know something about the application - but usually the learning curve is so steep that most users frustratedly give up. And documentation is either not existing, incomplete or horribly outdated, and StackOverflow etc. are even worse.

The exception is Blender. They got some serious money IIRC, cleaned up their act, and now there's a headline of some movie or game using Blender every few weeks.

Re:Windows 2000 Server named peak Microsoft. Readers say all... by lproven on Saturday April 12, 2025 @12:37PM (#43665915)
100% true.

The sad thing is that Windows has a great keyboard UI and it's superbly accessible for people with visual and motor disabilities.

Who have reduced earning opportunities because they are disabled, so FOSS should be great for them, but it isn't, because the nerds don't know CUA and don't know the keyboard UI. They spend their time mastering a couple of ancient apps like Vi and Emacs and ignore the fiery furnace of UI R&D that followed for the next 20Y after those early efforts.

Learn Windows' keyboard UI and you can drive the whole OS and all its apps with the speed of a genius Vim user with 20 years' practice. It makes Emacs look like a wet paper pad and a burned stick compared to a Moleskine notebook and a top quality fountain pen.

Xfce comes close and implements maybe 75% of the UI but once you are in an app all bets are off.

Re:Windows 2000 Server named peak Microsoft. Readers say all... by karthink on Saturday April 12, 2025 @02:11PM (#43666683)
> Learn Windows' keyboard UI and you can drive the whole OS and all its apps with the speed of a genius Vim user

Do you have a reference for this? I've often needed to control Windows using only a keyboard and failed to do so. I'm aware of most shortcuts in this list[1] but these are for a few very specific things. (As an aside, I also remember controlling the mouse with the numpad using the Mouse Keys accessibility setting but this is worse than both keyboard shortcuts and the mouse.)

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Table_of_keyboard_shortcuts

Re:Windows 2000 Server named peak Microsoft. Readers say all... by mschuster91 on Saturday April 12, 2025 @04:49PM (#43667840)
> Do you have a reference for this?

Look for underlined single letters in menus. With apps that use the "classic" style menus instead of ribbons or plain Electron crap, the single letters are the key.

Re:Windows 2000 Server named peak Microsoft. Readers say all... by karthink on Saturday April 12, 2025 @06:11PM (#43668298)
I'm curious to know if this is what lproven meant in their comment above. Alt + a-z to access menu items is available in every OS and all "native" apps, but you can't "drive the OS and all apps" this way.

For example, I would like to set options that are a few menus/button clicks deep in the Windows control panel (either the "classic" or new variant) using keyboard shortcuts/navigation. Or navigate the Windows registry editor. I'm not aware of a way to do this.

Re:Windows 2000 Server named peak Microsoft. Readers say all... by lproven on Monday April 14, 2025 @06:22PM (#43686935)
None of that is correct.

No, it's not in all OSes. I wish it were.

No, it's not in all native apps. KDE reinvents its own set of keystrokes, for instance, and half the KDE apps have no menu bars any more... And there's no global way to force them either.

Yes, the control panel and RegEdit are totally keyboard controllable.

You can literally just unplug the mouse from a Windows desktop and it remains totally 100% operable.

Some apps may not, because the developers didn't do their jobs right, but the OS is.

How else could blind people use PCs?

Re:Windows 2000 Server named peak Microsoft. Readers say all... by nyarlathotep_ on Saturday April 12, 2025 @05:47PM (#43668175)
I totally forgot about this until just now. That really was a brilliant feature.
Re:Windows 2000 Server named peak Microsoft. Readers say all... by lproven on Monday April 14, 2025 @09:43AM (#43681191)
It's called CUA.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_Common_User_Access

There are dozens of them out there.

Random example:

https://www.system-overload.org/windows-shortcuts.html

General guide...

Activate menu bar with Alt. Alt + the underlined letter opens that menu or submenu.

Alt+Space opens the control menu for that window. In MDI apps, alt+hyphen opens the document's window control menu.

Then...

Alt+space, x = maXimise Alt+space, n = miNimise Alt+space, s = reSize followed by cursor key to select which edge, then cursors to change.

Hotkeys are Ctrl+letter and do that action now.

Ctrl+... p = print s = save o = open f = find c = copy x = cut (looks like scissors) v = paste (looks like an arrow: paste _V_ HERE )

Shift modifies or reverses many commands, and selects while moving.

In dialogs and forms, Tab moves forwards; Shift+Tab backwards

Ctrl+PgDown = next tab Ctrl+PgUp = previous tab Ctrl+Enter = save and close form

Ctrl+left/right = move by word instead of character Shift+home/end = select to start/end of line

Esc = cancel

Ctrl+Esc = open start menu

Then tab, and you're tabbing through the taskbar, which is a sort of dialog box.

Ctrl+Shift+Esc = open task manager

Maybe this should be on a wiki somewhere so it can be documented collaboratively...

Re:Windows 2000 Server named peak Microsoft. Readers say all... by hulitu on Saturday April 12, 2025 @04:06PM (#43667548)
> Learn Windows' keyboard UI and you can drive the whole OS and all its apps with the speed of a genius Vim user with 20 years' practice

I'm sure you can give me some hints, because Microsoft, can't.

Re:Windows 2000 Server named peak Microsoft. Readers say all... by lproven on Monday April 14, 2025 @09:44AM (#43681200)
Re:Windows 2000 Server named peak Microsoft. Readers say all... by hulitu on Saturday April 12, 2025 @04:05PM (#43667537)
> The sad thing is that Windows has a great keyboard UI

Windows also has a great help system, online. /s

Re:Windows 2000 Server named peak Microsoft. Readers say all... by mschuster91 on Monday April 14, 2025 @04:13AM (#43679158)
Windows actually had a decent built-in manual system with CHM, tooltips and whatnot. Even games could and did use it, like EarthSiege 2.

Back in the days when application developers stuck to the Windows-provided widgets instead of doing their own UI, it was wonderful. Symbols were consistent across applications, as were color schemes (IIRC, if you wrote your CSS correctly, Internet Explorer would pass these on to websites!) and behavior.

I miss these days.

Re:Windows 2000 Server named peak Microsoft. Readers say all... by ziml77 on Saturday April 12, 2025 @02:03PM (#43666622)
> And documentation is either not existing, incomplete or horribly outdated, and StackOverflow etc. are even worse.

Or the documentation is very complete, but only useful if you read and comprehend it in its entirety. Open source devs need to understand that not everyone using their software wants to become an expert in it. They just want to get a task done and the software is facilitating completing that task. That is something totally normal and those users should not be thought of as less important than the power users.

Re:Windows 2000 Server named peak Microsoft. Readers say all... by hulitu on Saturday April 12, 2025 @04:04PM (#43667533)
> The problem is, most users are utterly braindead

Yeah, that's Microsoft's idea. All user are idiots. That's why they are not able to fix bugs but only change the UI.