News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Agent2Agent Protocol (A2A) by IanCal on Wednesday April 09, 2025 @04:09PM (#43637239)
Why do you assume there's a deterministic API doing the same thing?
Re:The Agent2Agent Protocol (A2A) by simonw on Wednesday April 09, 2025 @04:53PM (#43637843)
Because if a company built an LLM that can perform actions, they almost certainly did that by building an API first for it to use as a tool.
Re:The Agent2Agent Protocol (A2A) by IanCal on Thursday April 10, 2025 @06:16AM (#43642464)
But so much more besides that, including the model itself, RAG, the agentic workflow control, moderation, etc. There's also a huge factor of maintenance, that's a key reason why companies have different internal and external APIs - they don't just open up everything internal and hand the code for managing all of that to you. Interface design is really important.

Not to mention the cost being a factor here - who pays for which part.

Re:The Agent2Agent Protocol (A2A) by simonw on Thursday April 10, 2025 @09:14AM (#43643448)
Offering up an LLM-fronted "agent" for people to send their LLMs to talk to feels a whole lot more expensive and complicated to me than operating a traditional API endpoint.
Re:The Agent2Agent Protocol (A2A) by IanCal on Thursday April 10, 2025 @05:33PM (#43648222)
A traditional API endpoint wrapping an agent? That's pretty much what this is but as a standard so we don't need to build thousands of them.
Re:The Agent2Agent Protocol (A2A) by phillipcarter on Wednesday April 09, 2025 @05:12PM (#43638053)
Because there often is?