Anthropic launches its own $200 plan

Re:Anthropic launches its own $200 plan by smallerfish on Wednesday April 09, 2025 @02:42PM (#43635848)

At last. I honestly think the product engineering org at Anthropic has serious issues. They are slow to ship, and quality of the webapp has been decidedly mixed in the past 6 months. Some of the UX decisions they've made are bone-headed.

(OpenAI launched their pro plan 4 months ago!)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Anthropic launches its own $200 plan by bastardoperator on Wednesday April 09, 2025 @03:13PM (#43636388)

I just assumed most people at this point are using a client.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Anthropic launches its own $200 plan by tener on Wednesday April 09, 2025 @03:27PM (#43636611)

It is hardly better though. Aside from MCP support (with rather poor UX, just compare it with anything else out there) it really has nothing to offer.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Anthropic launches its own $200 plan by bastardoperator on Wednesday April 09, 2025 @05:00PM (#43637927)

I've been satisfied with msty and code/cursor.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Anthropic launches its own $200 plan by yieldcrv on Wednesday April 09, 2025 @03:31PM (#43636680)

I actually like Claude over ChatGPT specifically because of how their web UI distinguishes.

Its clear that neither company prioritizes their flagship chat UI, over their other offerings. So if it will be in stasis, I definitely like it

There are other web AI offerings now (deepseek web, perplexity, to name a few). This is what I like between these two:

The speed of responses.

The reliability. ChatGPT web UI often times out or has server errors for random things.

Different censorship. Overall better for my use cases, and how errors are handled.

Initially search of old chats was a first class citizen. ChatGPT has since updated, but is still lackluster in this regard.

The diagrams, charting and coding interface is great and better. Easier for seeing how something compiles and runs, easier to copy and paste.

[ Parent | on HN ]