News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The "S" in MCP Stands for Security by khafra on Monday April 07, 2025 @01:22AM (#43608018)
Sounds like you're saying the distinction shouldn't be between instructions and data, but between different types of principals. The principal-agent problem is not solved for LLMs, but o1's attempt at multi-level instruction priority works toward the solution you're pointing at.
Re:The "S" in MCP Stands for Security by wat10000 on Monday April 07, 2025 @08:27AM (#43610508)
What’s the difference? That sounds like two ways of describing the same idea to me.
Re:The "S" in MCP Stands for Security by LoganDark on Monday April 07, 2025 @12:08PM (#43613031)
They're not the same idea. One is about separating instructions and data, the other is about separating different sources of instructions, such that instructions from an unauthorized source are not followed (but instructions from an authorized source are).