Re:Bodega cats make New Yorkers' hearts purr, even if they v...
by precommunicator on Saturday April 05, 2025 @08:58PM
(#43598089)
I guess learning about every single law in every single situation would be this one thing that's "sure they're not easy and they take time" but:
Quoting from the swedish driver education book[1].
> It is not desirable to have 100% adherence to the rules. According to the criteria for a category B licence, you must display “good judgement when interacting with other road users”. A reasonable interpretation of this statement is that you may depart from the rules in some cases.
I feel the same can be said about many other situations.
Re:Bodega cats make New Yorkers' hearts purr, even if they v...
by JumpCrisscross on Sunday April 06, 2025 @01:38PM
(#43603238)
> weird to be on the hot pan for defending the rule of law
You’re confusing lawbreaking/lawlessness with the rule of law [1].
But on the spirit of a good conversation (see @dang, I'm behaving :)) to your point of whether I have ever broke the law or not ... most likely yes, but not consciously.
Many times I have refrained from doing things for the sole reason that it would be unlawful, even though I disagree with it.
There's a big difference between that and choosing to consciously break the law for a menial pleasure.
Edit: So weird to be on the hot pan for defending the rule of law, lmao. What a terrible status quo.