Re:NOAA Weather will delete websites using Amazon, Google cl...
by _fat_santa on Friday April 04, 2025 @10:58AM
(#43583391)
I can't speak for others but in my experience, NOAA gave me the most accurate weather for my area, and it wasn't even close. If they take the site down I hope they at least keep the API's up so folks here can build frontends
Re:NOAA Weather will delete websites using Amazon, Google cl...
by financetechbro on Friday April 04, 2025 @11:07AM
(#43583527)
Not sure what party of the excerpt gave you the impression that they are keeping any of NOAA around
Re:NOAA Weather will delete websites using Amazon, Google cl...
by krowfromthewall on Monday April 07, 2025 @07:00AM
(#43609922)
its going to be like twitter, anything that remains up will be broken beyond any utility. And since this is not something which derives values from others' contributions, it won't even survive beyond this in any form.
Re:NOAA Weather will delete websites using Amazon, Google cl...
by insane_dreamer on Friday April 04, 2025 @12:43PM
(#43584891)
> Each of these functions could be provided commercially, likely at lower cost and higher quality.
The false promise of privatization.
> The National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) should be dismantled and many of its functions eliminated, sent to other agencies, privatized, or placed under the control of states and territories.
> Break Up NOAA. The single biggest Department of Commerce agency outside of decennial census years is the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, which houses the National Weather Service, National Marine Fisheries Service, and other components. NOAA garners $6.5 billion of the department's $12 billion annual operational budget and accounts for more than half of the department's personnel in non-decadal Census years (2021 figures).
> This industry's mission emphasis on prediction and management seems designed around the fatal conceit of planning for the unplannable. That is not to say NOAA is useless, but its current organization corrupts its useful func-tions. It should be broken up and downsized.
> NOAA today boasts that it is a provider of environmental information services, a provider of environmental stewardship services, and a leader in applied scientific research. Each of these functions could be provided commercially, likely at lower cost and higher quality.
> Focus the NWS on Commercial Operations. Each day, Americans rely on weather forecasts and warnings provided by local radio stations and colleges that are produced not by the NWS, but by private companies such as AccuWeather.
> Studies have found that the forecasts and warnings provided by the private companies are more reliable than those provided by the NWS.
> The NWS provides data the private companies use and should focus on its data-gathering services. Because private companies rely on these data, the NWS should fully commercialize its forecasting operations.