News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Dalton Caldwell: App.net is not Vaporware. Parent comment

Re:Dalton Caldwell: App.net is not Vaporware by anu_gupta on Wednesday August 08, 2012 @04:56PM (#4358017)
No, the upside is that as app.net relies on people paying money, the users are customers instead of being the product.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Dalton Caldwell: App.net is not Vaporware by look_lookatme on Wednesday August 08, 2012 @05:19PM (#4358149)
What's the product then?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Dalton Caldwell: App.net is not Vaporware by neeee on Wednesday August 08, 2012 @05:39PM (#4358227)
I think it's the service that is the product.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Dalton Caldwell: App.net is not Vaporware by ceslami on Wednesday August 08, 2012 @09:31PM (#4359047)
Have you taken a moment to read anything about it? It is abundantly clear.

join.app.net, in case you really haven't, which I'm hoping is the case.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Dalton Caldwell: App.net is not Vaporware by look_lookatme on Thursday August 09, 2012 @03:51AM (#4360040)
That's no answer. As far as I can tell, the product is people willing to pay for their message updates and then a rev-share between the apps that allow them to do it, and Dalton's service.

If that's your idea of a product... good luck.

[ Parent | on HN ]