Reasoning models don't always say what they think

Re:Reasoning models don't always say what they think by Nevermark on Thursday April 03, 2025 @05:49PM (#43575887)

So you got help from a natural intelligence? No fair. (natdeo?)

Someone needs to create a clone site of HN's format and posts, but the rules only permit synthetic intelligence comments. All models pre-prompted to read prolifically, but comment and up/down vote carefully and sparingly, to optimize the quality of discussion.

And no looking at nat-HN comments.

It would be very interesting to compare discussions between the sites. A human-lurker per day graph over time would also be of interest.

Side thought: Has anyone created a Reverse-Captcha yet?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Reasoning models don't always say what they think by wyre on Thursday April 03, 2025 @08:16PM (#43576997)

This is an entertaining idea. User prompts can synthesize a users domain knowledge whether they are an entrepreneur, code dev, engineer, hacker, designer, etc and it can also have different users between different LLMs.

I think the site would clone the upvotes of articles and the ordering of the front page, and gives directions when to comment on other’s posts.

[ Parent | on HN ]