News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Wikipedia Redefined by DanBC on Wednesday August 08, 2012 @05:12AM (#4354629)
> I mean, yes, by all means get involved and help improve it.

I don't think you understand just how toxic some parts of the community are.

Re:Wikipedia Redefined by thinkingisfun on Wednesday August 08, 2012 @03:46PM (#4357651)
> I don't think you understand just how toxic some parts of the community are.

Oh, I do.. which is why I know you're talking about editors, not coders/designers, i.e. the ones it actually concerns.

But even if it was true for all of Wikipedia -- so? What is making some mockups and a (kinda pompous IMHO) domain name going to achieve in that case? Even less.

This is a bunch of designers talking to a bunch of designers, on a page I can hardly read because the letters are so huge and the horizontally so restricted. It's either a clever joke, or can be summed up with "ouch".

Re:Wikipedia Redefined by DanBC on Wednesday August 08, 2012 @06:45PM (#4358512)
You're right, I was very unclear.

This "redesign" is horrible for reasons that everyone gives in this thread. I agree.

There are some design changes that could be made to Wikipedia to make things easier for editors (and for regular editors) - see, for example, the wall of text at the head of some meta pages such as the main page, or ANI, or etc.