News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Google's Autonomous cars complete 300,000 miles without a... by StavrosK on Tuesday August 07, 2012 @08:40PM (#4353233)
Most of these things will not be possible merely because they give you an unfair advantage. What you call "racing" I call "being at my destination much sooner", and, yes please, I would like every other car to step aside so I can get home faster. Which, of course, only means that everybody will try to abuse this.
Re:Google's Autonomous cars complete 300,000 miles without a... by oillio on Tuesday August 07, 2012 @09:24PM (#4353376)
Make "race mode" cost money then. Cheap enough that an occasional race is not ridiculous, but expensive enough that it is not practical for a commute. It probably wouldn't be an incredible advantage anyway. Your car could drive much faster if it knew exactly what every car around it was planning on doing.
Re:Google's Autonomous cars complete 300,000 miles without a... by justin66 on Wednesday August 08, 2012 @03:16AM (#4354348)
At least in urban areas, you're eventually going to end up having vehicle performance arbitrated via radio by a computer network outside the vehicles. (I'm pretty sure it's much easier than trying to do everything "peer to peer," if you will) This gets you intersections where nobody has to fully stop and vehicles merely coordinate and modulate their speed, which is a pretty powerful efficiency advantage in itself.

With a system like that you could easily design a market where vehicles can choose to pay a toll to get a favorable path through traffic. You might see a few options and incentives given for choosing a more fuel-efficient path, etc.