Re:Why a plane turned around when a passenger lost a phone m...
by josephg on Sunday March 30, 2025 @04:12PM
(#43527211)
AirTags also don’t use rechargeable lithium batteries.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Why a plane turned around when a passenger lost a phone m...
by LoganDark on Sunday March 30, 2025 @06:14PM
(#43528218)
Aren't non-rechargeable batteries still at least a little dangerous, though?
Re:Why a plane turned around when a passenger lost a phone m...
by Zak on Sunday March 30, 2025 @08:05PM
(#43529151)
They're more dangerous. The reason lithium-metal batteries are "non-rechargeable" isn't that recharging them doesn't work; it's that they have an unacceptable probability of exploding during the process. Other forms of electrical, thermal, or mechanical abuse can have similarly spicy results.
Re:Why a plane turned around when a passenger lost a phone m...
by Zak on Sunday March 30, 2025 @08:03PM
(#43529134)
Spare non-rechargeable lithium batteries are also forbidden in checked luggage[0]. AirTags are allowed because the battery is installed in a device, though Lufthansa briefly tried to argue otherwise after some bad press involving passengers finding their own lost bags[1].
[0] https://www.faa.gov/hazmat/packsafe/lithium-batteries
[1] https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2022/10/lufthansa-awkwardly-...