Re:Why a plane turned around when a passenger lost a phone m...
by Spartan-S63 on Sunday March 30, 2025 @10:38AM
(#43524553)
In that particular instance, that pilot also mentioned there were issues with engine oil pressure, IIRC, and the fuel filter was scheduled to be replaced after the long haul flight over water. Those concerning data points were what led to him not “feeling it.” That type of casual language, IMO, makes it easier for people to empathize with the conclusion based on hard facts.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Why a plane turned around when a passenger lost a phone m...
by cedws on Sunday March 30, 2025 @11:02AM
(#43524731)
Still I've never heard a pilot communicate like that. On the European airlines I've flown on the pilot would concisely and professionally explain the situation and then make a formal apology.
Re:Why a plane turned around when a passenger lost a phone m...
by burnished on Sunday March 30, 2025 @02:45PM
(#43526468)
OK, Karen
Re:Why a plane turned around when a passenger lost a phone m...
by jerlam on Sunday March 30, 2025 @03:23PM
(#43526777)
This probably happens on American airlines, but it won't make the news so you won't know about it unless you were on the plane.
Re:Why a plane turned around when a passenger lost a phone m...
by DAGdug on Sunday March 30, 2025 @03:31PM
(#43526832)
The language of the corporate meeting room in America is also a lot more casual than in Europe. It has zero bearing on actual professionalism (defined, “ the competence or skill expected of a professional”) given the results of American corporations (or the strong safety record of US pilots). So, while I can literally understand your point, I can’t see why it’s material to anything.