News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Utah becomes first US state to ban fluoride in its water by Spivak on Saturday March 29, 2025 @08:59PM (#43520197)
I guess the question is why your priors are so far weighted to the side of negative outcomes. If we're talking about yet undiscovered effects of something it seems equally plausible for those effects to be positive. Aspirin is a pretty good example of this where we keep discovering more positive effects. And I can understand somewhat the bias toward the state of nature but there's lots of examples where our deviations were positive, the biggest one being the cognitive effects of cooking food.
Re:Utah becomes first US state to ban fluoride in its water by dataflow on Saturday March 29, 2025 @09:28PM (#43520385)
> If we're talking about yet undiscovered effects of something it seems equally plausible for those effects to be positive.

Where do you get this from? If you ingest a random chemical (or imagine licking random objects...), do you really expect the chances of it being beneficial vs. detrimental to your health to be remotely close to 50/50?