Pointing out disinformation is a valuable thing to do, and well in the spirit of hacker news.

I checked through their comment history. They are fixated on protecting oligarchs who are currently providing disinformation as a service to America's wealthy class. Let's please not kid ourselves.

When I read your comment, what I see is "I checked through their comment history. They disagree with my political viewpoint, so I'm going to use the popular talking points from my in-group to attack them."

I glanced through your comment history as well, and I'm convinced that you are a lot smarter than that, and can add more to the conversation.

Looking through your comment history it seems like you use a thesaurus on a few posts so that you can defend people like him in other posts.

What about my comment history?!

> popular talking points from my in-group to attack them

Pointing out that we're currently being de facto ruled by a circle of wealthy billionaires and millionaires is not a "talking point". This comes across as projection.

> I'm convinced that you are a lot smarter than that

Thank you. I'm not sure what you're looking for me to add to the conversation however, I just plainly said what I saw, which was them to bat for several oligarchs who are currently making a mockery of our country.

In his case, I would often call it "adding noise to the signal" and not "pointing out disinformation".

They’ve been here for ages but you can basically see what happens when you self-identify with a party rather than principles and put your intellect to work rationalizing positions selected by other people. I miss their contributions of a decade ago.

> what happens when you self-identify with a party rather than principles and put your intellect to work rationalizing positions selected by other people

This is a problem for a lot of people, regardless of political spectrum.

When your identity is tied to a political group, criticism of that group transfers to criticism of self, and there aren't many people that enjoy that.

That has certainly been the case for the past few decades and I, personally, think we may have reached some sort of breaking point. The other day on a somewhat popular radio show catering to a specific group typically associated with one US party the calls to divest from political affiliation to a Party as a deciding factor were a lot more common and urgent in tone. I know what I think and I do think US 2 party system is part of its current set off issues, but it was odd to hear some of those thoughts expressed in the wild.

Don't get me wrong, the tribe mentality is absolutely still there, but for the first time in a while I am hearing something akin to 'fuck it'.

Yes - it’s a cognitive pitfall humans are prone to. You can see it with any group membership - here on HN, how many comments have we seen where someone is defensive about legitimate criticism about their favorite programming language or style – but it can be especially bad with politics because it can be weaponized by people acting in bad faith with significantly more negative consequences.

Wow that’s incredible, is it some kind of bot or would a human do that for some reason?

There are a huge number of people on this site that are heavily invested in early Tesla stock. Their history is egregious and likely a sock puppet account like the one that flooded the car poll in Germany, but there were many people who would defend him to just keep the stock healthy

If you are heavily invested in early Tesla stock you should've cashed out, unless people are so greedy and irradiated that a 50x/10y RoI isn't good enough.

Found Elon's sock