Yeah it is more profitable but revenues are way down.

In 2021, the last full year before Musk's acquisition, Twitter generated $5.08 billion in revenue.

Under Musk's ownership, X's revenue has declined significantly. In 2024, X reported $2.7 billion in revenue, which is nearly half of its pre-acquisition level. For 2025, global ad revenue is projected to grow to $2.26 billion, marking its first annual increase since the acquisition.

So yes on paper, X is more profitable than Twitter was before the acquisition. Its 2024 adjusted EBITDA nearly doubled Twitter’s best year, despite a much smaller revenue base. But whether that profitability is sustainable or comes at too high a cost—strategically, reputationally, and culturally—remains an open question.

You didn't actually show profitability here. I think if it were actually profitable, Musk would've hyped it up.

Lol, who did the adjusting!? ... Good old "adjusted EBITDA".

Ok, but how is that relevant? I'd much rather have a more profitable business than one with more top-line revenue.