News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Blasting Past WebP - An analysis of the NSO BLASTPASS iMe... by acdha on Friday March 28, 2025 @10:23AM (#43505814)
I think there’s a stronger form of the argument: image formats are expensive to create and secure, and that should have factored into WebP adoption given its marginal benefits.

The lesson I hope was learned is that nobody should be writing new parsers in an unsafe language. WebP is old enough that it was defensible at the time but everyone should have a “no new C/C++” policy for internet-facing code.

Re:Blasting Past WebP - An analysis of the NSO BLASTPASS iMe... by saagarjha on Friday March 28, 2025 @03:16PM (#43509007)
Yes, I think we’re going to see this moving forward. The tools are in place to make this possible.