Re:Zoom bias: The social costs of having a 'tinny' sound dur...
by guappa on Thursday March 27, 2025 @05:52PM
(#43498614)
I don't think anyone is going to blow 1 month of their salary to sound better on zoom.
Re:Zoom bias: The social costs of having a 'tinny' sound dur...
by spacechild1 on Thursday March 27, 2025 @07:48PM
(#43499621)
You can get a decent 2-in 2-out audio interface for 100€ or less. I can recommend Behringer's UMC series: https://www.thomann.de/at/behringer_u_phoria_umc204hd.htm
Re:Zoom bias: The social costs of having a 'tinny' sound dur...
by __mharrison__ on Thursday March 27, 2025 @11:21PM
(#43501169)
I have the Scarlett audio version. It works fine. However, I played around swapping my mics with the $1200 Sound Devices Pre2, and it just sounds amazing. I'm not sure what is going on inside that box. I haven't been able to justify that purchase.
Re:Zoom bias: The social costs of having a 'tinny' sound dur...
by guappa on Friday March 28, 2025 @04:19AM
(#43502831)
I actually bought a sound card, different model. But to do recording. I don't bother to plug it for zoom calls :D
Re:Zoom bias: The social costs of having a 'tinny' sound dur...
by __mharrison__ on Thursday March 27, 2025 @06:02PM
(#43498691)
Are you referring to the $1200 audio device? Yes, that is expensive. It is meant for professional recording.
The average software salary in the US is about $10k a month. Few spend that much on audio equipment.
Re:Zoom bias: The social costs of having a 'tinny' sound dur...
by LtWorf on Thursday March 27, 2025 @06:22PM
(#43498873)
Why do you presume that software developers are the only ones doing zoom calls?
Re:Zoom bias: The social costs of having a 'tinny' sound dur...
by setr on Thursday March 27, 2025 @10:41PM
(#43500908)
You’re on a software developer forum
Re:Zoom bias: The social costs of having a 'tinny' sound dur...
by guappa on Friday March 28, 2025 @09:15AM
(#43505053)
An international forum, there's more countries than USA.
Re:Zoom bias: The social costs of having a 'tinny' sound dur...
by setr on Friday March 28, 2025 @03:20PM
(#43509047)
nobody suggested anything otherwise
also original post only actually recommends $100 - $200 mics, so this entire subthread has been a bumbling series of utter nonsense
Re:Zoom bias: The social costs of having a 'tinny' sound dur...
by yrxuthst on Thursday March 27, 2025 @07:20PM
(#43499391)
I use a BPHS1, in my case I found that replacing the ear pads with 3rd party gel pads greatly improved the comfort for long meetings.
Re:Zoom bias: The social costs of having a 'tinny' sound dur...
by __mharrison__ on Thursday March 27, 2025 @08:05PM
(#43499749)
I replaced my pads with microfiber ones. The pads don't cause me pain, the top of my head hurts after 4 hours or more.
The professional equipment sounds the best, but the audio device alone (sans mic) was $1200.
These days, I use the pencil mic with a Scarlett device. It sounds good enough for my recording needs (I post-process everything regardless). It is out of camera, and pencil mics (or shotgun) are what pros use in camera studios.
If you don't mind having a big mic on camera, the Fifine is a lot of bang for the buck. If you are a brand person, go for the Shure.
A headset is great for minimizing sound when talking with others (say for a podcast interview), but I have yet to find one that is comfortable for using all day (I'm often teaching day-long courses).