Is WPA2 security broken due to Defcon MS-CHAPv2 cracking?

Re:Is WPA2 security broken due to Defcon MS-CHAPv2 cracking? by ojno on Tuesday August 07, 2012 @07:55AM (#4349629)

Flamebait title -- the answer at the end of the article is "No." :-P

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Is WPA2 security broken due to Defcon MS-CHAPv2 cracking? by wlesieutre on Tuesday August 07, 2012 @08:07AM (#4349656)

Betteridge's Law of Headlines in action!

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Is WPA2 security broken due to Defcon MS-CHAPv2 cracking? by corin_ on Tuesday August 07, 2012 @08:44AM (#4349771)

Does this really need to be brought up every single time a submission has a question in the title?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Is WPA2 security broken due to Defcon MS-CHAPv2 cracking? by wlesieutre on Tuesday August 07, 2012 @09:45AM (#4350037)

I think it's worth pointing out when the title is a blatant attempt to get more people to read it. If they'd just said "WPA2 Isn't Broken Due to Defcon Hacking" then a lot less people would click through. I'll give him credit for starting off with "Quick answer: no" though.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Is WPA2 security broken due to Defcon MS-CHAPv2 cracking? by nuttendorfer on Tuesday August 07, 2012 @08:52AM (#4349809)

I'd say it's warranted in this situation.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Is WPA2 security broken due to Defcon MS-CHAPv2 cracking? by alter8 on Tuesday August 07, 2012 @08:09AM (#4349662)

I could put the answer in the title, but it would get edited back to OP's title.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Is WPA2 security broken due to Defcon MS-CHAPv2 cracking? by jrockway on Tuesday August 07, 2012 @11:44AM (#4350597)

Actually, it's the first line of the article.

[ Parent | on HN ]