News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Gemini 2.5 by kridsdale3 on Tuesday March 25, 2025 @04:56PM (#43475868)
I just tried your trademark benchmark on the new 4o Image Output, though it's not the same test:

https://imgur.com/a/xuPn8Yq

Re:Gemini 2.5 by Unroasted6154 on Tuesday March 25, 2025 @05:21PM (#43476127)
Was that an actual SVG?
Re:Gemini 2.5 by simonw on Tuesday March 25, 2025 @05:36PM (#43476261)
No that's GPT-4o native image output.
Re:Gemini 2.5 by sebzim4500 on Tuesday March 25, 2025 @06:27PM (#43476734)
I wonder how far away we are from models which, given this prompt, generate that image in the first step in their chain-of-thought and then use it as a reference to generate SVG code.

It could be useful for much more than just silly benchmarks, there's a reason why physics students are taught to draw a diagram before attempting a problem.

Re:Gemini 2.5 by simonw on Tuesday March 25, 2025 @06:46PM (#43476874)
Someone managed to get ChatGPT to render the image using GPT-4o, then save that image to a Code Interpreter container and run Python code with OpenCV to trace the edges and produce an SVG: https://bsky.app/profile/btucker.net/post/3lla7extk5c2u
Re:Gemini 2.5 by qingcharles on Wednesday March 26, 2025 @12:31PM (#43484007)
Does this match the rules of your test, or is it cheating? :)
Re:Gemini 2.5 by jonomacd on Wednesday March 26, 2025 @03:46AM (#43479795)
And the same thing with gemini 2.0 flash native image output.

https://imgur.com/a/V4YAkX5

It's sort of irrelevant though as the test is about SVGs.