Spammers are better at SPF, DKIM, and DMARC than everyone else

Re:Spammers are better at SPF, DKIM, and DMARC than everyone... by zelon88 on Tuesday March 25, 2025 @10:03AM (#43471455)

Sounds like an issue with an outdated locally hosted IP2 Location database.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Spammers are better at SPF, DKIM, and DMARC than everyone... by blacklion on Tuesday March 25, 2025 @10:44AM (#43471969)

Google thinks it is in Russia too. And Cloudflare thinks the same.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Spammers are better at SPF, DKIM, and DMARC than everyone... by carlhjerpe on Tuesday March 25, 2025 @11:47AM (#43472712)

If it's Hurricane Electrics tunnel I've had similiar issues, I think they use Russian blocks for their IPv6 tunnel since the abuse potential is so high and they don't want to deal with it so they just bundle all their shit with Russia and move on.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Spammers are better at SPF, DKIM, and DMARC than everyone... by blacklion on Wednesday March 26, 2025 @09:28AM (#43482065)

Yep, it is HE tunnel. Nice to know that I'm not alone.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Spammers are better at SPF, DKIM, and DMARC than everyone... by liveoneggs on Tuesday March 25, 2025 @11:08AM (#43472261)

maybe you actually have a MITM proxy stealing all of your traffic and keystrokes

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Spammers are better at SPF, DKIM, and DMARC than everyone... by blacklion on Wednesday March 26, 2025 @09:29AM (#43482083)

MITM for HTTPS? I don't think so!

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Spammers are better at SPF, DKIM, and DMARC than everyone... by raxxorraxor on Wednesday March 26, 2025 @03:47AM (#43479796)

Sounds more like IP isn't a reliable factor to determine location. Not that this would be bad though.

[ Parent | on HN ]