Spammers are better at SPF, DKIM, and DMARC than everyone else

Re:Spammers are better at SPF, DKIM, and DMARC than everyone... by throw0101c on Tuesday March 25, 2025 @08:59AM (#43470650)

> Marketing will simply demand changes to the config that they do not understand and there is nothing you can do to stop it as they will have the CEO on their side.

Marketing should get their own (sub)domain for sending their missives, that way the primary corporate domain's reputation is not harmed.

Unless you want to run the risk of outgoing e-mails from Finance / Accounts Receivable to be sent to other companies' Junk folder.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Spammers are better at SPF, DKIM, and DMARC than everyone... by nkrisc on Tuesday March 25, 2025 @09:14AM (#43470797)

It's amusing to see this advice in this thread contrasted with the recent Troy Hunt phishing attack thread where folks are complaining about companies like Microsoft having dozens of varying domain names.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Spammers are better at SPF, DKIM, and DMARC than everyone... by throw0101c on Tuesday March 25, 2025 @09:18AM (#43470854)

> […] about companies like Microsoft having dozens of varying domain names.

There's a difference between one and dozens, and even between one dozen and dozens.

Most companies are not of Microsoft's size either: just having news.example.com would probably be sufficient for a lot places.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Spammers are better at SPF, DKIM, and DMARC than everyone... by rchaud on Tuesday March 25, 2025 @03:27PM (#43474897)

This is email marketing 101, HN'ers are massively overstating how many domains are getting blacklisted because of "marketing".

[ Parent | on HN ]