Re:Landrun: Sandbox any Linux process using Landlock, no roo...
by throwfaraway398 on Saturday March 22, 2025 @04:17PM
(#43448309)
I saw there's an option to match on a cgroup among nft meta expressions (but I've never tried it). It could be enough if you just want to add per-process firewall rules, but not configure an additional namespace with it's associated interfaces, routing/nating.
Re:Landrun: Sandbox any Linux process using Landlock, no roo...
by kanbankaren on Saturday March 22, 2025 @05:54PM
(#43448947)
Yes. You could match packets based on username or even SELinux labels.
You could also set a special mark on a packet for each container and then filter based on that. The Internet is surprsingly very thin on nft resources. I spent a few weeks learning how to write them. Definitely, not for the average consumer.
[1] https://firejail.wordpress.com/documentation-2/basic-usage/#... "A network namespace is a new, independent TCP/IP stack attached to the sandbox. The stack has its own routing table, firewall and set of interfaces."