Re:CopBlock.org Founder Faces 21 Years in Prison for Reporti...
by mcantelon on Sunday August 05, 2012 @09:05PM
(#4343278)
I don't think one party recording a conversation they're in with another party should be considered wiretapping in general, and especially not if one party is a public official. Public officials' actions affect people's lives and shielding their communication and actions from scrutiny reduces their accountability.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:CopBlock.org Founder Faces 21 Years in Prison for Reporti...
by MrVitaliy on Sunday August 05, 2012 @09:59PM
(#4343394)
"Under United States federal law and most state laws there is nothing illegal about one of the parties to a telephone call recording the conversation, or giving permission for calls to be recorded or permitting their telephone line to be tapped. However, several states (e.g., California, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania and Washington) require that all parties consent when one party wants to record a telephone conversation."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telephone_recording_laws
Too bad he's in New Hampshire, otherwise him being one of the party aware of recording the conversation would make the recording perfectly legal.
Re:CopBlock.org Founder Faces 21 Years in Prison for Reporti...
by MrVitaliy on Monday August 06, 2012 @12:28AM
(#4343725)
His lawyers can probably blow this out of state (internet being an inter-state medium, appeals and maybe even supremacy clause) where federal law will take precedence over the state law. This case will be a waste of time, money and government resources and a circus nonetheless.