The problem is defining negative impact and also timing. For example, I can stop doing backups and save time and money. There is zero negative impact right up until the point I need to use the backup, then the impact is catastrophic.
Sure. Another fallout of unfettered capitalism. Just with an indeterminate delay between cause and effect.
if a CEO can run 7 companies and still play monopoly with the ship of government, then maybe CEOs aren't really that useful.
He's the hype man, it's the band and the crew who are running the show.
Recent changes to Tesla’s stock price suggest otherwise.
They would suggest that only if the primary reason behind valuation changes is company performance and not political sentiment.
Yeah it’s only worth 700B now, what a loser /s
Not as appropriate in a government setting where the impact goes far beyond personal profit and loss.