The F-35 as a Subscription Service

Re:The F-35 as a Subscription Service by nickff on Thursday March 20, 2025 @04:31PM (#43428562)

The Su-35 has a combat range of 1600 kilometers, and the two Canadian fighter bases are about 2750km apart, which means they can barely fight in the area directly between the bases! The Su-35 would not be an effective interceptor when so far from the threats either (as the response times would be terrible). If Canada wants to defend itself from aerial threats, it just needs more bases and more planes.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The F-35 as a Subscription Service by dingaling on Thursday March 20, 2025 @05:39PM (#43429296)

If a notional Canuck Su-35 couldn't do it, probably nothing could.

The Su-35 has one of the highest fuel fractions of any military aircraft at about 38% of max take-off weight. That's 9% higher than an F-22 and equates to 11,500kg of fuel.

Just conceptualise 11.5 tonnes of fuel - basically an American yellow school bus being hauled into the air by a fighter than can do Mach 2 and pull 9g.

To be fair though the F-35A has a remarkably high fuel capacity too, about 8,000kg. All that chunkiness has an advantage.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The F-35 as a Subscription Service by blackeyeblitzar on Thursday March 20, 2025 @06:13PM (#43429615)

Some quick math…

Jet fuel is about 7 pounds a gallon. So we’re talking about something like 4000 gallons. A bus is something 40 feet by 10 feet by 10 feet, which is like 20000 gallons. So it’s about a fifth of a school bus.

Still a lot, though!

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The F-35 as a Subscription Service by adwn on Friday March 21, 2025 @03:07AM (#43432596)

I think dingaling meant "an American yellow school bus in mass", not in volume. 11,500 kg sounds about right for a bus that size.

[ Parent | on HN ]