News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:What's all this fuss about Erlang? by silentbicycle on Sunday August 05, 2012 @10:39AM (#4341531)
Erlang is not about parallelism, it's about fault tolerance. It's about "making reliable distributed systems in the presence of software errors" (as Armstrong's thesis is titled).

How will your STM example behave if the computer managing the transactions suddenly has a massive hardware failure?

Re:What's all this fuss about Erlang? by johndonsp on Sunday August 05, 2012 @12:05PM (#4341771)
I completely agree with you about fault-tolerance. However Erlang, CSP, actors and message passing are heralded as the key to parallelism. The Erlang book still promises n-times speedup for n-cores, with not enough of a caveat.
Re:What's all this fuss about Erlang? by silentbicycle on Sunday August 05, 2012 @03:03PM (#4342272)
I'm not familiar with the plane scheduling problem, there is probably room to parallelize it further. I suspect people are far less likely to book seats on both sides of the aisle(s) at the same time, for example. Knowing more about those things, airline regulations, and so on will probably present other opportunities.