News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Crew-9 Returns to Earth by throwway120385 on Wednesday March 19, 2025 @09:48AM (#43411949)
What interview? Can you link it?
Re:Crew-9 Returns to Earth by queuebert on Wednesday March 19, 2025 @12:00PM (#43413729)
https://x.com/CollinRugg/status/1897470032612851893

(Note: I don't know anything about the X account. It was just the first result I found.)

Edit: Also it sucks that I can't ask a genuine question on this website without getting downvoted to oblivion. Whatever the answer, it would be nice to get it without being judged.

Re:Crew-9 Returns to Earth by beej71 on Wednesday March 19, 2025 @12:24PM (#43414103)
The astronauts in that clip say they have no information on who said what to whom, so it takes the wind out of the sails of the statement that everything Musk says is factual.
Re:Crew-9 Returns to Earth by acdha on Wednesday March 19, 2025 @07:46PM (#43418469)
> Also it sucks that I can't ask a genuine question on this website without getting downvoted to oblivion

You asked a question in a confrontational manner, and which had the same misrepresentation as various political operatives have been using. I think you got caught up in looking like you knew the answer but were hoping that readers did not, which is common enough that many people try to discourage it here.

Re:Crew-9 Returns to Earth by queuebert on Wednesday March 19, 2025 @10:13PM (#43419316)
You (and others apparently) applied an incorrect emotion to my unemotional comment. Typical text only communication. The whole point of the "genuinely asking" part was to show I wasn't trying to "gotcha" anyone.

I have barely followed the issue but had heard the astronauts confirmed Musk's side. How else was I supposed to ask about that? What magical wording could I use so that all of you don't try to put me in a belief box?

Re:Crew-9 Returns to Earth by mjrpes on Wednesday March 19, 2025 @11:19AM (#43413172)
Probably cherry picking their c-span interview on March 4:

> Asked about the claims of political motivations for their extended stay, Wilmore said that Musk and Trump may have information “that we are not privy to.”

But then he says:

> But, he said, “from my standpoint, politics is not playing into this at all. From our standpoint, I think that they would agree, we came up prepared to stay long, even though we plan to stay short.”

The fact check article is pretty comprehensive: https://www.factcheck.org/2025/03/the-facts-behind-the-delay...